BILL NO.
|
AUTHOR(S)
|
SUBJECT
|
STATUS
|
TAC'S ACTION
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.J.R. 22
|
Marty Block (D-39) San Diego Co-Authors Senators Beall, Evans, Hill, Jackson, Leno, and Pavley; Assembly Members Dickinson, Fong, and Williams
|
As introduced in Senate, March 24, 2014, S.J.R 22 would urge Congress to enact legislation to establish reasonable deadlines to prohibition testing and marketing of cosmetic products tested on animals and urge the federal government to mandate alternatives to animal testing of cosmetic products and to prioritize the validation and acceptance of additional nonanimal tests. Senate Floor Analysis, April 3, 2014 ASM Com on Bus, Profs & CP Policy Analysis,6/9/2014 Assembly Floor Analysis, June 11, 2014
|
Senate Floor 4/7/14 pass 31-0 (9) ASSEMBLY, HELD AT DESK, 5/23/14 ASM Com on Bus, Profs & CP Hrg 6/10 pass 11-0 (3) ASM Floor 3rd Rdg 6/19 Pass 69-1(9,V) Enrolled 6/20/2014 Chaptered by Secretary of State. Res. Chapter 73. Statutes of 2014
|
|
S.B. 1243 Introduced 2/20/14
|
Ted Lieu (D-43) Torrance ASM Co-Author, Susan Bonilla (D-14) Concord
|
As introduced, did not include VMB. Amended in Senate, April 21, 2014 would amend Business & Professions Code Sec. 4800 to extend the sunset date of the enabling statute for the Veterinary Medical Board from 1/1/16 to 1/1/2017 and certain other sections subject to this date. SEN Com on Bus, Profs & Econ Dev Policy Analysis, 4/28/14 SEN Com on Appropriations Fiscal Analysis, 5/12/14 SEN Com on Appropriations, Release hrg, 5/23/2014 Senate Floor Analysis, May 23, 2014 ASM Com on Bus, Profs & CP Policy Analysis, 6/24/2014
Amended in Assembly, June 30, 2014
ASM Com on Appropriations Fiscal Analysis, 8/5/14
Amended in Assembly, August 18, 2014 Assembly Floor Analysis, August 18, 2014 Senate Concurrence Analysis, August 26, 2014
|
SEN Com on Business, Professions & Economic Development 4/28 pass 9-0 SEN Com on Approps 5/12/14 SUSPSENSE FILE Release Hrg 5/23 Pass 7-0 Senate Floor, 3rd Rdg 5/27 pass 36-0 (4) ASM Com on Bus, Profs & CP Hrg 6/24 pass 13-0(1) as amended ASM Approps 8/6 SUSPENSE, passed 17-0 as amended Assembly 3rd Rdg 8/25 pass 77-1(1,V) Senate, Concurrence pass 36-0 (4) 8/28/14 Enrolled 9/3 To Governor Approved by Governor 9/20 CHAPTERED
|
|
S.B.. 1278 Introduced 2/21/2014
|
Mark Leno (D-11) San Francisco 4/1/14 add co-authors Senators Anderson, Knight and Wyland
4/23/14 delete Senator Wyland
|
As introduced, AB 1278 amend Penal Code Section 830.9 to add training requirements for Animal Control Officers (ACOs). Senate Com on Public Safety Policy Analysis, 3/24/14 Amended in Senate, April 1, 2014 to require ACOs hired before 7/1/15 to complete 40 hrs CE before 7/1/18; those apptd later must complete within 3 yrs of apptmnt and every 3 years thereafter. Amended in Senate, April 23, 2014 adds to Section 30652 of the Food and Agricultural Code a new sub-section (5) for priority of use of dog license fees: "(e) Fifth, to pay for initial and in-service training for persons charged with enforcing animal control laws, including animal control officers." SEN Com on Appropriations Fiscal Analysis, 4/28/2014 amendments recommended SEN Com on Appropriations, Release Analysis, 5/23/2014
|
Com on Public Safety 3/25 Pass 7-0 as amended Sen Approps 4/28 6-0 (1) to SUSPENSE FILE Release Hrg 5/23 Held under submission
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.B. 1511 Introduced 1/14/2014
|
Beth Gaines (R-6) Rocklin
|
As introduced, AB 1511 would amend Penal Code Section 11105 that requires maintaining "State summary criminal history information” for a number of categories of public employees and to furnish it to these if needed in the course of their duties and authorizes charging a fee, to clarify types of animal control officers included. Assembly Com on Public Safety Policy Analysis, March 11, 2014 Amended in Assembly, March 17, 2014, reorganizing provisions. ASM Com on Appropriations Fiscal Analysis, 4/9/14 Assembly Floor Analysis, April 16, 2014 Amended in Senate, June 3, 2014 deletes amendment to PC Sec. 11105 and adds a new Section 11105.07 restricted to animal control officers. Further amends PC Section 13300 Qualifying language changed to: "officer, authorized to exercise powers specified in Section 830.9" Creates crimes for certain misuse of reports. Specifies no state reimbursement therefor, because local agency has power to levy assessments to cover its additional costs. Senate Com on Public Safety Policy Analysis, 6/9/14 Senate Com on Public Safety Policy Analysis, 6/11/14 Senate Floor Analysis, July 1, 2014 Amended in Senate, August 5, 2014 to clarify that the ACO will receive a state summary criminal history. Senate Floor Analysis, August 6, 2014 Assembly Concurrence Analysis, 8/12/14
|
To Com on Public Safety Hrg 3/11 pass 6-0 (1) as amended Com on Appropriations Hrg 4/9 pass 17-0 Assembly 3rd Rdg. 4/21 pass 78-0 (1,V) Senate Com on Public Safety Hrg 6/10 pass 6-0(1) Sen APPROPS Hrg 6/23, cancelled @author request Hrg 6/30, Rule 28.8 SENATE 3rd Rdg 8/11 pass 36-0 (4) Assembly Concurrence in Senate Amendments pending, on or after 8/14 pass 79-0 (V) 8/19 Enrolled Governor 8/19 Approved by Governor 9/19 Chaptered
|
5
|
A.B. 1520 Introduced 1/16/2014
|
Mike Gatto (D-43) Burbank
<This bill represents the author's experiment in crowdsourcing legislation. According to the author, the bill is the result of "months of deliberation among the participants of the WikiPage that was established to create and refine legislation limited to the Probate Code." >
|
As introduced, AB 1520 dealt with non-probate transfers. SPOT BILL
http://mikegatto.wikispaces.com/Probate+Draft+Legislation
As amended March 28, 2014, would authorize a court to appoint a guardian ad litem at any stage of a proceeding under the Probate Code to represent the interest of a nonhuman animal who is either an estate asset or part of a trust res, if the court makes the same determination. As amended April 10, 2014, the scope of covered animals was narrowed to "for which a trust has been established if the court determines that representation of the interest otherwise would be inadequate." As amended April 23, 2014, nonsubstantive. Assembly Floor Analysis, April 24, 2014 Amended in Senate, May 23, 2014 to amend Probate Code Section 1003 (guardian ad litem generally) to add a specific sub-section for animals as related to Section 15212 (pet trusts). SEN Com on Judiciary Policy Analysis, June 9, 2014 Amended in Senate, June 16, 2014 per Analysis to prohibit appointment of a public guardian relative to Probate Code Section 15212. Senate Floor Analysis, June 18, 2014 Senate Floor Analysis, July 2, 2014 Assembly Concurrence Analysis, August 20, 2014
Judicial Council of California. DE-350/GC-100 [Rev. January 1, 2008 Form Adopted for Mandatory Use Petition for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem - PROBATE
See 2008 SB 685 (Yee) repealing Probate Code Sec. 15212 that had provided honorary but allegedly unenforceable trusts for the benefit of trustors' animals and enacting a new PC Sec. 15212 expressly providing enforceable trust provisions.
|
ASM Com on Judiciary Hrg 4/22 pass 10-0 Assembly Floor 3rd Rdg 5/1 Pass 72-0 (7, 1V)
Senate Com on Judiciary HRG 6/10 @2:15 pm, on call 4-2 (Anderson, Vidak) pass to Senate Floor, author's amendments per analysis 5 pm call lifted, Lara, aye, pass out 5-2 Hearing Audio
SENATE 3rd Rdg 8/20 Gatto By Lieu pass 24-7 (9) STRAIGHT PARTISAN VOTE Senate 28 Dems, 12 Reps
Assembly Concurrence in Senate Amendments 8/22 pass 73-0 (6,V)
8/26/14 Enrolled
9/5/2014 To Governor
9/19/2014 VETOED VETO MESSAGE
|
OPPOSE
|
A.B. 1809 Introduced 2/18/14
|
Brian Maienschein (R-77) San Diego Sponsor: ASPCA
|
As introduced, AB 1809 would amend Section 122055 of the Health and Safety Code (Polanco Lockyer Pet Breeder Warranty Act) to change the time records must be kept from one year to 12 months - a technical, non-substantive change. Amended in Assembly, March 28, 2014 to require "person seeking to bring a dog into this state, or importing dogs into this state for the purpose of resale or change of ownership, to obtain a health certificate with respect to that dog that has been completed by a licensed veterinarian and is dated within 10 days prior to the date on which the dog is brought into the state." Only exemption: "a person who brings a dog into the state for no longer than 7 consecutive days in order to participate in a dog show or exhibition." And, it is the "responsibility of persons importing dogs into this state for the purpose of resale or change of ownership to send the health certificate to the county health department where the dog is to be offered for sale or to the county of residence of the individual purchasing a dog directly from a source outside of California." Amended in Assembly, April 10, 2014 limiting scope to "A person seeking to bring a dog into this state or importing dogs into this state for the purpose of resale or change of ownership." Local filing requirements remain. ASM Com on Bus, Profs & CP Policy Analysis, 4/21/14 Amended in Assembly, April 23, 2014 amends provision for jurisdiction in which certificate is to be filed: "(c) It shall be the responsibility of persons importing dogs into this state for the purpose of resale or change of ownership to send the health certificate to the county health department where the dog is to be offered for sale or to the county of residence of the individual purchasing or receiving a dog directly from a source outside of California; amends exemptions: 121721. (a) This chapter does not apply to a person who brings a dog into the state that will not be offered for resale or if the ownership of the dog is not expected to change. (b) This chapter does not apply to the import of a dog used for law enforcement or military work, a guide dog, as defined by subdivision (d) of Section 365.5 of the Penal Code, or a dog imported as a result of a declared emergency as described by Section 8558 of the Government Code or an investigation by law enforcement of an alleged violation of state or federal animal fighting or animal cruelty laws. ASM Com on Appropriations Fiscal Analysis, 5/13/2014 Amended in Senate, June 9, 2014 to add enforcement provision, infraction level crime: 121723. (a) A person who violates a provision of this chapter is guilty of an infraction, punishable by a fine not to exceed two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for each dog for which a violation has occurred. (b) In lieu of punishment pursuant to subdivision (a), authorized animal control personnel may issue a correction warning to a person who violates a provision of this chapter, unless the violation endangers the health or safety of the animal, the animal has been wounded as a result of the violation, or a correction warning has previously been issued to the individual. The correction warning shall require the person to correct the violation. (Local government can assess fees to offset cost of state mandate.) Sen Com on Bus, Profs & Econ Dev Policy Analysis 6/18/14 Amended in Senate, July 1, 2014 to clarify that the person who is reselling or changing ownership of the imported dog is the person who shall submit the health certificate to the county health department. Amended in Senate, August 5, 2014 to clarify that the person in CA importing the dog into CA for purpose of resale/change of ownership is mandated to file by any means accepted by the local agency; allows alternate administrative fine/corrective warning instead of infraction penalty. Senate Floor Analysis, August 6, 2014 Assembly Concurrence Analysis, August 13, 2014
APHIS Policy #18, Health Certificate for Dogs, Cats, and Nonhuman Primates
|
SPOT BILL Com on Business, Profs & Cons Prot Hrg 4/22 pass 14-0 as amended, to ASM Approps Hearing Audio
ASM Approps Hrg 5/14 pass 17-0 ASM Consent Cal 2nd day - 5/23/14 pass 73-0 (6, V) Sen Com on Bus, Profs & EconDev Hearing 6/16, cancelled @author rqst Hrg 6/23 pass 8-0 (1) as amended text pending
Hearing Audio
SEN Approps Hrg 8/5 Rule 28.8, amended
Senate, 3rd Rdg 8/11 pass 35-0 (5)
Assembly Concurrence in Senate amendments, 8/14 pass 79-0 (V)
Enrolled 8/18/14
Governor 8/21
Approved by Governor 9/20
CHAPTERED
|
OPPOSE 4/10/14 OPPOSE 4/11/14
|
A.B, 1810 Introduced 2/18/14
|
Brian Maienschein (R-77) San Diego
Sponsor: ASPCA
|
As introduced, AB 1810 would amend Civil Code Sections 1834.5 and 1834.6 dealing with dogs or cats abandoned at a kennel, cat kennel, pet-grooming parlor, animal hospital, or any other animal care facility to authorize rather than require euthanasia if the animal cannot be placed with a new owner AND authorize turning the animal over to a "public animal control agency or shelter, society for the prevention of cruelty to animals shelter, or humane society shelter, provided that the shelter has been contacted and has not refused to take the animal." ASM Com on Business, Profs & Cons Prot. Policy Analysis 3/25/2014 Assembly Floor Analysis, March 27, 2014 Amended in Senate, May 5, 2014 to add "nonprofit animal rescue group" to list of permitted safety net transferees. Changed language for all transferees from "not refused" to "agreed." Amended in Senate, June 2, 2014 to amend Civil Code Section 1834.5(a) to allow the person holding the abandoned dog/cat to turn it over to permitted transferees without the 10 search-for-new-owner period; (b) non-veterinarians holding abandoned dog/cat may not euthanize it. New (c): nothing to be construed to require euthanasia. Other non-substantive revision. Sen Com on Judiciary Policy Analysis, June 9, 2014 Senate Floor Analysis, June 12, 2014 Assembly Concurrence Analysis, June 18, 2014
|
Com on Business, Profs & Cons Prot Hrg 3/25 pass 14-0 Hearing Audio ASSEMBLY FLOOR 3rd Reading 3/28 3/28 pass 71-0 (9) SEN Com on Judiciary Hrg 6/10 Consent Cal
SENATE CONSENT Calendar 2nd Day 6/16 pass 35-0 (5)
ASM Concurrence 6/19 Pass 78-0 (1,V)
Enrolled 6/20/2014 6/24 To Governor Chaptered 7/7/2014
|
|
A.B. 1965 Introduced 2/19/14
|
Mariko Yamada (D-4) Yolo County
Co-Author Sen. Ted Lieu (D-28) Torrance
Sponsor: Social Compassion in Legislation
Add ASM Co-Authors: Gatto, Levine, Williams
|
As introduced, AB 1965 would amend Section 114259.5 of, and to add Section 114259.6 to, the Health and Safety Code, relating to outdoor dining facilities to read: (a) A food facility may permit a person to bring a pet dog on to the food facility’s outdoor dining areas. (b) A city, county, or city and county may by ordinance prohibit a food facility from allowing a person to bring a pet dog to the food facility’s outdoor dining area. Assembly Committee on Health Policy Analysis, March 25, 2014 Amended in Assembly, March 28, 2014, to include a list of specific requirements and prohibitions. ASM Com on Local Government Policy Analysis, 4/9/14 Assembly Floor Analysis, 4/23/14 Amended in Assembly, May 5, 2014 adds and refines details Assembly Floor Analysis, May 7, 2014 Sen Com on Health Policy Analysis, June 25, 2014 Senate Floor Analysis, June 30, 2014
|
Dual referred ASM Com on Health on Local Govt Com on Health Hearing 3/25 pass 17-1 (1) ASM Local Govt Hrg 4/9 pass 17-0 ASM Third Reading 5/8 pass 71-1(7,V) Sen Com on Health Hrg 6/25 pass 8-0 (1) SENATE 3rd Rdg 8/7 pass 36-0 (4) Enrolled, to Governor 8/13 8/21 approved by Governor Chaptered
|
|
A.B. 2056 Introduced 2/20/2014
|
Matt Dababneh (D-45 Encino) Sponsor: California Department of Insurance
|
As introduced, AB 2056 would amend and add to the Insurance Code to add pet insurance as a separate category, define terms, insurer mandates, process and penalties. ASM Committee on Insurance Policy Analysis, 4/19/14 Amended in Assembly, April 24, 2014 extends effective date to 7/1/15, many changes and adds rulemaking authority under Department of Insurance. ASM Com on Appropriations Fiscal Analysis, 5/6/2014 Amended in Senate, May 22, 2014 to delete amendment to Section 120 of Ins. Code. defining classes of insurance so that the bill is limited to a new Part 9 of Division 2, Classes of Insurance; definition of pre-existing condition includes any waiting period. Sen Com on Insurance Policy Analysis, June 9, 2014 Sen Com on Appropriations Fiscal Analysis, June 23, 2014 Senate Floor Analysis, June 24, 2014 Amended in Senate, August 6, 2014, technical amendments. Senate Floor Analysis, August 8, 2014 Assembly Concurrence Analysis, August 12, 2014
See 2010 AB 2411, HSUS Sponsor, Governor Schwarzenegger Veto Note: AB 2411 author Dave Jones is current Insurance Commissioner
|
ASM Com on Insurance Hrg 4/23 pass 13-0 as amended ASM Approps Hrg 5/7 pass 17-0 To Consent ASM Consent Cal Pass 78-0 (1,V) Sen Com on Insurance Hrg 6/11 pass 10-0(1) Sen APPROPS Hrg 6/23 pass 7-0 SEN Spec Consent Cal No. 18, 6/26 3rd Rdg 8/11 pass 36-0 (4) Assembly Concurrence in Senate Amendments 8/18 pass 78-0 (1, V)
Enrolled 8/20 8/27 to Governor 9/30 Signed by Governor Chaptered
|
|
A.B. 2140 Introduced 2/20/2014
|
Richard Bloom (D- 50) Santa Monica SEN co-author Mark Leno (D-11) San Francisco
|
As amended in Assembly, March 28, 2014, from the spot bill to publicized intention to "ban killer whales from Sea World" formally: hold in captivity, or use, a wild-caught or captive-bred orca, as defined, "This bill would make it unlawful for performance or entertainment purposes, as defined, to capture in state waters, or import from another state, any orca intended to be used for performance or entertainment purposes, to breed or impregnate an orca in captivity, or to export, collect, or import from another state the semen, other gametes, or embryos of an orca held in captivity for the purpose of artificial insemination, except as provided." ASM Com on Water, Parks & Wildlife Policy Analysis
From committee: That the measure be retained in committee, and that the subject matter be referred to the Committee on Rules for assignment to the proper committee for study. (April 8). By unanimous consent.
|
Dual referred: ASM Com on Water, Parks & Wildlife AND Com on Arts, Entertainment, Sports, Tourism and Internet Media
WP&W Hrg 4/8 To Interim Study (until next year, i.e. different Legislature
Hearing Audio
|
|
A.B. 2205 Introduced 2/20/2014
|
Tim Donnelly (R-33) Hesperia 4/23/ add co-authors ASM Members Grove, Logue, and Olsen Senators Berryhill, Knight, and Nielsen
|
As introduced, AB 2205 would repeal provisions in the Fish and Game Code prohibiting use of dogs to pursue bears and bobcats and add other provisions. Amended in Assembly, April 23, 2014 adds specifics: eliminates the authority for the department to capture a dog not under the reasonable control of its owner or handler when the dog is pursuing any bear or to capture or dispatch a dog inflicting injury or immediately threatening injury on any bear; eliminates restrictive uses of dogs to pursue bears; repeals definition of hound used to pursue bears and provisions for hound stamps. ASM Com on Water, Parks & Wildlife Policy Analysis 4/29/14
See 2013 AB 1213 - Bobcat Protect Act of 2013
|
ASM Com on Water Parks & Wildlife Hrg 4/29 FAIL 5-8 (2)
|
|
A.B. 2264 Introduced 2/21/2014
|
Marc Levine (D-10) Marin/Southern Sonoma (San Rafael)
ADD: Fran Pavley (D-27) Principal Co-Author
|
June 15, 2014 as amended in Senate, GUT/AMEND to amend Government Code Sections 13955 and 13957 to include as eligible for compensation from the California Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board Restitution Fund persons with a disability whose guide, signal, or service dog is disabled or killed due offenses under Penal Code Section 600.2 (DOG causes loss) or 600.5 (PERSON causes loss IF defendant required to BUT UNABLE make restitution to the person with the disability who has custody or ownership of the dog for any veterinary bills, replacement costs of the dog, or other reasonable costs deemed appropriate by the court if the dog is disabled or killed. Sen Com on Public Safety Policy Analysis, June 24, 2104 Amended in Senate, July 2, 2014 to remove condition for eligibility. Amended in Senate, August 4, 2014 to limit recovery to $10,000.00. SEN Com on Appropriations Fiscal Analysis, 8/4/14 Senate Floor Analysis, August 6, 2014 Assembly Concurrence Analysis, August 13, 2014 Assembly Floor Analysis August 26, 2014
|
SENATE COM on Public Safety Hrg 6/24 pass 7-0 as amended SEN Approps Hrg 8/4 pass 7-0 Senate, 3rd Rdg 8/13 pass 36-0 (4)
Assembly Concurrence in Senate Amendments 8/18 Re-referred to ASM Com on Public Safety, ASM Rule 77.2 Hrg 8/26 pass 7-0 Assembly Floor 8/27 pass 77-0 (2,V) Enrolled 9/8/14 To Governor Approved by Governor 9/20 Chaptered
|
|
A.B. 2326 Introduced 2/21/2014
|
Roger Dickinson (D-7) Sacramento
Sponsor: ASPCA
|
As introduced, AB 2326 would authorize, for tax years 2015-2019 a tax deduction not exceeding $100 by a taxpayer for qualified adoption costs for a pet adopted from a qualified animal rescue organization. Taxpayer could designate a specified amount in excess of tax liability to the Pet Adoption Cost Deduction Fund created by this bill but not to be added until another voluntary contribution is removed from the list. Contributions would be allocated to offset cost of the deduction with excess to the Dept of Ag municipal shelter fund. ASM Com on Revenue & Taxation Policy Analysis, 4/19/14 Amended in Assembly, May 6, 2014 eliminates creation of the Pet Adoption Cost Fund; for taxable years 1/1/15 before 1/1/20, would allow a deduction not to exceed $100, under that law for the qualified costs paid or incurred by a taxpayer for the adoption of a pet from a qualified animal rescue organization. ASM Com on Appropriations Fiscal Analysis, 5/13/2013
|
Com on Revenue & Taxation Hrg 4/7 Hearing cancelled, author rqst Hrg 4/21 Hrg 4/28 pass 9-0 as amended ASM Approps HRG 5/14 SUSPENSE FILE Release Hrg 5/23 HELD UNDER SUBMISSION
|
|
A.B.2343 Introduced 2/21/2014
|
Mike Gatto (D-43) Burbank
|
As introduced, AB 2343 would make non-substantive changes to Food & Ag Code Section 31108 regarding impounded stray dogs. Amended in Assembly, April 10, 2014 Hayden holding provisions, funding - complex; see bill for details. Amended in Assembly, April 21, 2014 removed "rescue" definition originating from Vincent bill, 1998, amended provisions re funding.
|
SPOT BILL ASM Com on Local Govt Hrg 4/30 Cancelled, author rqst
|
|
A.B. 2431 Introduced 2/21/2014
|
Matt Dababneh (D-45 Encino)
|
As introduced, AB 2431 would add to the Education Code a new Section 66017.7 (a) Any public postsecondary educational institution or independent institution of higher education, or employee or student thereof, that confines dogs or cats for the purposes set forth in Section 1650 of the Health and Safety Code, and intends to destroy a dog or cat that has been used for those purposes, shall first offer the dog or cat to an animal adoption organization or animal rescue organization. (b) For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply: (1) “Animal adoption organization” or “animal rescue organization” means a not-for-profit entity that is exempt from taxation pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a collaboration of individuals with at least one of its purposes being the sale or placement of animals that have been removed from a public animal control agency or shelter, society for the prevention of cruelty to animals shelter, or humane shelter, or that have been previously owned by any person. (2) “Independent institution of higher education” means a nonpublic educational institution as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 66010. (3) “Public postsecondary educational institution” means any campus of the University of California, the California State University, or the California Community Colleges. c) This section does not apply to animals within the meaning of Section 17006 of the Food and Agricultural Code. ASM Com on Higher Education Policy Analysis, 4/29/2014 ASM Com on Appropriations Fiscal Analysis, 5/7/2014
|
ASM Com on Higher Education Hrg 4/29 pass 12-0 (1) ASM Approps Hrg 5/7 POSTPONED BY COMMITTEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|